Legal Opinion

State v. Matit

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided May 16, 2014No. S-13-318PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Nebraska Advance Sheets STATE v. MATIT 163 Cite as

288 Neb. 163

State of Nebraska, appellee, v. Daniel D. Matit, also known as Yai Bol, appellant. ___ N.W.2d ___ Filed May 16, 2014. No. S-13-318. 1. Constitutional Law: Search and Seizure: Motions to Suppress: Appeal and Error. In reviewing a trial court’s ruling on a motion to suppress based on a claimed violation of the Fourth Amendment, an appellate court applies a two-part standard of review. Regarding historical facts, the appellate court reviews the trial court’s findings for clear error, but whether those facts trigger or violate Fourth…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Brinegar v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1949
  2. Beck v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
  3. State v. DixonNebraska Supreme Court · 2013
  4. State v. BuckmanNebraska Supreme Court · 2000
  5. State v. AuNebraska Supreme Court · 2013

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. State v. AbdullahNebraska Supreme Court · 2014
  2. State v. HendersonNebraska Supreme Court · 2014
  3. State v. PerryNebraska Supreme Court · 2016
  4. Federal Nat. Mortgage Assn. v. MarcuzzoNebraska Supreme Court · 2014
  5. State v. RothenbergerNebraska Supreme Court · 2016

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API