Legal Opinion
State v. Au
Nebraska Supreme Court
Decided May 3, 2013No. S-12-040PublishedCited by 28 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Nebraska Advance Sheets STATE v. AU 797 Cite as
285 Neb. 797
designated as an expert. We further conclude that the Court of Appeals erred in holding that this error was not prejudicial. Finding prejudicial error, we reverse the judgment of the Court of Appeals and remand this matter with directions that it vacate the district court’s judgment and remand this cause to the dis- trict court for a new trial. R eversed and remanded with directions. Stephan, J., participating on briefs. Wright, Miller-Lerman, and Cassel, JJ., not participating. State of Nebraska, appellee, v. Doan Q. Au, appellant.…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Berkemer v. McCartySupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- United States v. Brignoni-PonceSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- State v. ThomteNebraska Supreme Court · 1987
- Smith v. State, Dept. of Motor VehiclesNebraska Supreme Court · 1995
- State v. DailNebraska Supreme Court · 1988
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by28 opinions
- State of Tennessee v. Linzey Danielle SmithTennessee Supreme Court · 2016
- State v. HendersonNebraska Supreme Court · 2014
- State v. KnutsonNebraska Supreme Court · 2014
- State v. ThalkenNebraska Supreme Court · 2018
- State v. BarbeauNebraska Supreme Court · 2018
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.