Legal Opinion

State v. Abdullah

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided September 26, 2014No. S-12-908PublishedCited by 79 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Nebraska Advance Sheets STATE v. ABDULLAH 123 Cite as

289 Neb. 123

in connection herewith. Upon due consideration, the court approves the conditional admission and enters the orders as indicated below. CONCLUSION Respondent is suspended from the practice of law for a period of 2 years, effective immediately. Respondent shall comply with Neb. Ct. R. § 3-316 (rev. 2014), and upon failure to do so, he shall be subject to punishment for contempt of this court. Respondent is also directed to pay costs and expenses in accordance with

Neb. Rev. Stat. §§ 7-114

and 7-115 (Reissue 2012) and Neb. Ct. R. §§…

2Cases cited26 opinions

  1. Bousley v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
  2. Massaro v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2003
  3. Hobart N. Crocker, Jr. v. Piedmont Aviation, Inc., Hobart N. Crocker, Jr. v. Piedmont Aviation, Inc.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1995
  4. State v. FilholmNebraska Supreme Court · 2014
  5. State v. MolinaNebraska Supreme Court · 2006

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by79 opinions

  1. State v. BlantonOhio Supreme Court · 2022
  2. State v. HaynesNebraska Supreme Court · 2018
  3. State v. BlakeNebraska Supreme Court · 2022
  4. State v. MoraNebraska Supreme Court · 2017
  5. State v. GolyarNebraska Supreme Court · 2018

74 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API