Legal Opinion

State v. Dixon

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided July 26, 2013No. S-12-525PublishedCited by 47 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Nebraska Advance Sheets 334 286 NEBRASKA REPORTS is greater by fifteen percent than the amount of the award, . . . the court may in its discretion award to the condemnee a reasonable sum for the fees of his or her attorney and for fees necessarily incurred for not more than two expert witnesses. The court awarded such fees, and we find no abuse of discretion. The district court also awarded “costs” to Pinnacle. From the court’s order, we read “costs” to include the deposition expenses for $1,419.50. We have treated such expenses as costs in the past.35 Unlike interest and fees, however, the…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Holbrook v. FlynnSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Perry v. New HampshireSupreme Court of the United States · 2012
  3. State v. RogersNebraska Supreme Court · 2009
  4. State v. MataNebraska Supreme Court · 2003
  5. State v. WattNebraska Supreme Court · 2013

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by47 opinions

  1. State v. RochaNebraska Supreme Court · 2017
  2. State v. CasaresNebraska Supreme Court · 2015
  3. State v. SmithNebraska Supreme Court · 2016
  4. State v. GrantNebraska Supreme Court · 2016
  5. State v. OlbrichtNebraska Supreme Court · 2016

42 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API