State v. Henderson
Nebraska Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
Nebraska Advance Sheets STATE v. HENDERSON 271 Cite as
289 Neb. 271
of a district court that is reasonably supported by the record.15 We cannot conclude from the record that the findings of the district court in the § 2-105(B)(5) hearing were so unsubstanti- ated that any purported errors were injurious to the integrity, reputation, or fairness of the judicial process as to justify reversal on appeal under the plain error doctrine.16 CONCLUSION For the foregoing reasons, we affirm the judgment of the Court of Appeals. Affirmed. Heavican, C.J., and Cassel, J., not participating. 15 Steffy v.…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Griffith v. KentuckySupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Taylor v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
- Herring v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Riley v. Cal. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2014
- Mink v. KnoxCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2010
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by36 opinions
- State v. HenryNebraska Supreme Court · 2016
- State v. HendersonNebraska Supreme Court · 2018
- State v. StubbendieckNebraska Supreme Court · 2019
- State v. GoynesNebraska Supreme Court · 2019
- State v. SierraNebraska Supreme Court · 2020
31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.