Legal Opinion
Pappas v. United States
United States Court of Federal Claims
Decided June 8, 2005No. 05-219CPublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
HORN, Judge.
Dennis J. Pappas, plaintiff, brings this action against the government seeking $10,000,000.00 in damages for allegedly breaching an agreement not to prosecute the plaintiff. The government has moved to dismiss the action for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. The facts, construed in a light most favorable to the non-moving party, Mr. Pappas, are as follows.
FINDINGS OF FACT
According to the complaint, [deleted] Dennis J. Pappas, the plaintiff, entered into an agreement with the defendant United States (the Agreement) to provide services to the government, while maintaining…
2Cases cited66 opinions
- Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Scheuer v. RhodesSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Franchise Tax Bd. of Cal. v. Construction Laborers Vacation Trust for Southern Cal.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
- McNutt v. General Motors Acceptance Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1936
- Immigration & Naturalization Service v. St. CyrSupreme Court of the United States · 2001
61 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Woodson v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2009
- Edelmann v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2007
- Trudeau v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2005
- American Floor Consultants & Installations, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2006