Legal Opinion

Trudeau v. United States

United States Court of Federal Claims

Decided September 26, 2005No. 05-263 CPublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION AND ORDER

GEORGE W. MILLER, Judge.

This matter is before the Court on defendant’s motion to dismiss plaintiffs complaint pursuant to Rule 12(b)(1) of the Rules of the Court of Federal Claims (“RCFC”) for lack of subject matter jurisdiction or, in the alternative, pursuant to RCFC 12(b)(6) for failure to state a claim upon which relief can be granted. Oral argument was deemed unnecessary. For the reasons set forth below, defendant’s motion to dismiss pursuant to RCFC 12(b)(1) is GRANTED.

BACKGROUND1

I. Nature of the Case

The ease arises from a dispute regarding the wording of a press…

2Cases cited41 opinions

  1. Scheuer v. RhodesSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  2. McNutt v. General Motors Acceptance Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1936
  3. United States v. TestanSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  4. Davis v. SchererSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  5. United States v. MitchellSupreme Court of the United States · 1980

36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Edelmann v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2007
  2. Stovall v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2006
  3. Federal Trade Commission v. Direct Marketing Concepts, Inc.District Court, D. Massachusetts · 2008
  4. Knowlton v. Attorney GeneralSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2009
  5. Federal Trade Commission v. Direct Marketing Concepts, Inc.District Court, D. Massachusetts · 2009

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API