Legal Opinion

Grunst v. Immanuel-St. Joseph Hospital

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided June 3, 1988No. C0-87-2449PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SIMONETT, Justice.

In this workers’ compensation appeal we affirm the finding of causal relationship, affirm deferment of the permanent partial disability claim to another time, and, on the issue of whether the employee voluntarily retired from the work force, reverse and remand for consideration of the statutory presumption.

On December 18, 1984, employee Ruby Grunst, then 59 years old, quit her employment as a food service worker with Imman-uel-St. Joseph Hospital. Shortly thereafter, she filed a petition for workers’ compensation benefits, claiming disability and inability to work because of…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. McClish v. Pan-O-Gold Baking Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1983
  2. Boldt v. Jostens, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1977
  3. Henry v. Sears, Roebuck and Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1979
  4. Scott v. Southview Chevrolet Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1978
  5. Nibbe v. City of St. PaulSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1982

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Frandsen v. Ford Motor Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 2011
  2. Steffen v. Target StoresSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1994
  3. Beecher v. TAMBRANDS, INC.District Court, D. Minnesota · 1993
  4. Behrens v. City of FairmontSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1995
  5. Dawn M. Simonson, Respondent, vs. Douglas County, and Minnesota Counties Intergovernmental Trust, RelatorsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2025

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API