Legal Opinion

Beecher v. TAMBRANDS, INC.

District Court, D. Minnesota

Decided February 12, 1993No. Civ. 3-90-639PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

RENNER, Senior District Judge.

At a hearing on November 19, 1992, this Court orally granted defendant Tambrands, Inc.’s motion for partial summary judgment with respect to the plaintiffs’ claims of state law failure to warn in packaging and in advertising, and federal law failure to warn prior to 1982. However, the Court ordered further briefing on Tambrands’ motion for partial summary judgment with respect to Kathleen and Keith Beecher’s claim of failure to comply with federal package warning requirements and on Tambrands’ motion for summary judgment on the grounds that…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Garnac Grain Co. v. BlackleyCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1991
  2. Lindquist v. Tambrands, Inc.District Court, D. Minnesota · 1989
  3. Cornelison v. Tambrands, Inc.District Court, D. Minnesota · 1989
  4. Grunst v. Immanuel-St. Joseph HospitalSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1988

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Kandis L. Papike v. Tambrands Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1997
  2. Lulov v. Tambrands, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1993

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API