Legal Opinion
Frandsen v. Ford Motor Co.
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Decided August 10, 2011No. A11-0126PublishedCited by 22 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
ANDERSON, G. BARRY, Justice.
In this workers’ compensation case, we review on certiorari whether an employer waived a retirement presumption in the Workers’ Compensation Act by failing to expressly reserve the presumption in a stipulation for settlement. Relator Ford Motor Company asserts that it was entitled to cease payment of permanent total disability benefits when respondent George Frandsen turned 67 years old pursuant to a provision in Minn.Stat. § 176.101, subd. 4 (2010), which states: “Permanent total disability shall cease at age 67 because the employee is presumed retired from…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- American Family Insurance Group v. SchroedlSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2000
- Valspar Refinish, Inc. v. Gaylord's, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 2009
- Beck v. SpindlerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1959
- Swenson v. NickaboineSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2011
- Brekke v. THM Biomedical, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 2004
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by22 opinions
- Residential Funding Company v. Terrace Mortgage CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2013
- In re RFC & Rescap Liquidating Trust ActionDistrict Court, D. Maine · 2018
- White v. City of Elk RiverSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2013
- State ex rel. Swanson v. 3M Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 2014
- State v. R.H.B.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 2012
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.