Steffen v. Target Stores
Supreme Court of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
WAHL, Justice.
The Workers’ Compensation Court of Appeals affirmed the compensation judge’s determination that the employee had failed to prove a causal relation between her ordinary daily work and her lumbar back disability. We reverse and remand to the compensation judge for further proceedings.
From August 1989 through January 7, 1991, Laurie Steffen worked for Target Stores as a “zoner,” a job which required that she arrange and clean various departments of the employer’s retail stores. The job also involved periodic work stocking shelves with merchandise; and on two occasions,…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Gillette v. Harold, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1960
- Marose v. Maislin TransportSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1987
- Balow v. Kellogg Cooperative Creamery AssociationSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1956
- Forseen v. Tire Retread CompanySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1965
- Caddy v. R. Maturi & Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1944
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Harris v. Board of EducationCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2003
- Hudson v. Trillium StaffingSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2017
- Anderson v. Frontier CommunicationsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2012