Legal Opinion
Zarembski v. Warren
Connecticut Appellate Court
Decided June 23, 1992No. 10353PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtFoti, J.
The plaintiffs appeal from the judgment rendered for the defendants1 on this action for a declaratory judgment, a writ of mandamus, an order to show cause, and a temporary and permanent injunction. The plaintiffs challenge certain findings of the trial court, including its finding that article IV, § 4.2:9,2 of the zoning regulations of the town of Easton is constitutional. We affirm the judgment of the trial court.
The plaintiffs, Darryl and Nancy Zarembski, seek to prevent the enforcement of a zoning regulation that bars Darryl’s parents from occupying a caretaker’s house located on the…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Pandolphe's Auto Parts, Inc. v. Town of ManchesterSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1980
- Corey v. Avco-Lycoming DivisionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1972
- State v. NardiniSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1982
- Griffin Hospital v. Commission on Hospitals & Health CareSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1986
- Kaplan v. KaplanSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1982
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Clement v. ClementConnecticut Appellate Court · 1994
- Owens v. New Britain General HospitalConnecticut Appellate Court · 1993
- Solomon v. Hall-Brooke Foundation, Inc.Connecticut Appellate Court · 1993
- Solomon v. Hall-Brooke Foundation, Inc.Connecticut Appellate Court · 1993
- Property Group, Inc. v. Planning & Zoning Commission of TollandConnecticut Appellate Court · 1992
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.