Legal Opinion

In Re Donald R. Laskowski and Daniel R. Tekulve

Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Decided April 3, 1989No. 88-1349PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

PAULINE NEWMAN, Circuit Judge.

The decision of the United States Patent and Trademark Office Board of Patent Appeals and Interferences, rejecting claims 10 through 13 of Laskowski et al. patent application Serial No. 682,826 entitled “Band Saw Wheel”, for failure to meet the requirements of 35 U.S.C. § 103, is reversed.

Discussion

The Laskowski invention is a novel band saw wherein a pulley-type wheel is loosely fitted with a tire, on which a band saw blade rests. Laskowski states that his band saw has several desirable characteristics: it is readily adjusted, and doesn’t require careful fitting…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Interconnect Planning Corporation v. Thomas E. Feil, Robert O. Carpenter, v Band Systems, Inc., and Turret Equipment Corp.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1985
  2. In Re Howard SernakerCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1983
  3. In Re John A. DonohueCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1985
  4. In Re Gary E. GEIGERCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1987
  5. In Re Richard M. DeminskiCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1986

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Messerschmidt v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 1993
  2. In Re Chester W. NewellCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1989
  3. Endress + Hauser, Inc. v. Hawk Measurement Systems Pty. Ltd.District Court, S.D. Indiana · 1995
  4. In Re Edward L. Belfoure and Omar M. BoutniCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1991
  5. In Re Stan L. Floyd, Herbert D. Muise and Mark A. StanishCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1994

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API