In Re Howard Sernaker
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
NICHOLS, Circuit Judge.
This case is before us on appeal from the decision of the Patent and Trademark Office Board of Appeals (board). In a 2-1 decision, the board affirmed the examiner’s rejection, under 35 U.S.C. § 103, of claims 1-6 and 8-11 in appellant’s application serial No. 916,018, filed June 15, 1978, entitled “Embroidered Transfer and Method of Making.” These claims comprise all the claims in the case. We reverse.
I
Background
A. The Invention
Appellant has invented a type of embroidered emblem and a method of making the same. Claims 1 and 10, the only independent claims in appellant’s…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Graham v. John Deere Co. of Kansas CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- South Corporation and Seal Fleet, Inc. v. The United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1982
- In re RinehartCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1976
- In re FielderCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1973
- In re BurckelCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1979
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by92 opinions
- Stratoflex, Inc. v. Aeroquip CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1983
- W.L. Gore & Associates, Inc., Appellant/cross-Appellee v. Garlock, Inc., Appellee/cross-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1983
- Metabolite Laboratories, Inc. And Competitive Technologies, Inc. v. Laboratory Corporation of America Holdings (Doing Business as Labcorp)Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2004
- Lindemann Maschinenfabrik Gmbh v. American Hoist and Derrick Company, Harris Press and Shear Division, Commercial Metals CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1984
- Environmental Designs, Ltd. And the Trentham Corporation v. Union Oil Company of California and Ralph M. Parsons Co.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1983
87 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.