Legal Opinion
In Re Gary E. GEIGER
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Decided April 1, 1987No. Appeal 86-1103PublishedCited by 52 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ARCHER, Circuit Judge.
This is an appeal from a decision of the United States Patent and Trademark Office (PTO) Board of Patent Appeals and Interferences (board), Appeal No. 606-09, affirming the examiner’s rejection of all remaining claims, 43-63 and 65-67, in appellant’s patent application, Serial Number 373,903 (’903), under 35 U.S.C. § 103. We reverse.
OPINION
Background
The ’903 application, filed on May 3, 1982, is directed to a method of inhibiting scale formation on and corrosion of metallic parts in cooling water systems by use of compositions containing (1) a sulfonated styrene/maleic…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Graham v. John Deere Co. of Kansas CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Acs Hospital Systems, Inc., Appellant/cross-Appellee v. Montefiore Hospital and Wells National Services Corporation, Appellees/cross-AppellantsCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1984
- Bausch & Lomb, Inc. v. Barnes-Hind/hydrocurve, Inc., and Barnes-Hind International, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1986
- In Re Jack E. Caveney and Roy A. MoodyCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1985
- In Re Francis J.A.M.C. De Blauwe and Frank K.A. SelleslagsCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1984
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by52 opinions
- In Re Patrick H. O'farrell, Barry A. Polisky and David H. GelfandCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1988
- In Re Denis Rouffet, Yannick Tanguy and Frederic BerthaultCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1998
- Ecolochem, Inc. v. Southern California Edison CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2000
- In Re David H. FineCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1988
- In Re Hans OetikerCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1992
47 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.