Legal Opinion
In Re Stan L. Floyd, Herbert D. Muise and Mark A. Stanish
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Decided July 20, 1994No. 94-1071Unpublished
1Opinion of the Court
31 F.3d 1178
NOTICE: Federal Circuit Local Rule 47.6(b) states that opinions and orders which are designated as not citable as precedent shall not be employed or cited as precedent. This does not preclude assertion of issues of claim preclusion, issue preclusion, judicial estoppel, law of the case or the like based on a decision of the Court rendered in a nonprecedential opinion or order.
In re Stan L. FLOYD, Herbert D. Muise and Mark A. Stanish.
No. 94-1071.
United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit.
July 20, 1994.
Before NIES, NEWMAN, and RADER, Circuit Judges.
DECISION
RADER, Circuit Judge.
1
W…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Constant v. Advanced Micro-Devices, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1988
- Miles Laboratories, Inc. And Triangle Biomedical Equipment, Inc., Plaintiffs/cross-Appellants v. Shandon Inc. And Shandon Southern Products LimitedCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1993
- Howard A. Fromson, Appellant/cross-Appellee v. Advance Offset Plate, Inc., Appellee/cross-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1985
- Rosemount, Inc., Appellee/cross-Appellant v. Beckman Instruments, Inc., Appellant/cross-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1984
- In Re Jack E. Caveney and Roy A. MoodyCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1985
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.