Legal Opinion
Endress + Hauser, Inc. v. Hawk Measurement Systems Pty. Ltd.
District Court, S.D. Indiana
Decided June 27, 1995No. IP 92-440 CPublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ENTRY REGARDING PATENT VALIDITY ISSUES
BARKER, Chief Judge.
In the first part of the bifurcated trial, this Court found that Defendants Hawk Measurement Systems Pty. Limited, Inc., and Hawk America, Inc. (“Defendants” or “Hawk”) literally infringed Plaintiffs Endress + Hau-ser, Inc.’s and Endress + Hauser GmbH’s (collectively “E + H” or “Plaintiffs”) patent. See Endress + Hauser, Inc. v. Hawk Measurement Systems Pty., 32 U.S.P.Q.2d 1768, 1994 WL 736442 (S.D.Ind. Aug. 29, 1994). On April 3-6, 1995, this Court conducted a bench trial on the remaining issues of patent validity and damages. Having…
2Cases cited48 opinions
- Graham v. John Deere Co. of Kansas CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- American Hoist & Derrick Company, Cross-Appellee v. Sowa & Sons, Inc., Cross-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1984
- Stratoflex, Inc. v. Aeroquip CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1983
- Hybritech Incorporated v. Monoclonal Antibodies, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1986
- Pennwalt Corporation, Appellant/cross-Appellee v. Durand-Wayland, Inc., Appellee/cross-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1987
43 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Glaxo Wellcome, Inc. v. Pharmadyne Corp.District Court, D. Maryland · 1998
- Old Town Canoe Co. v. GLENWA, INC.District Court, D. Oregon · 2002