City of Washington Court House v. McStowe
Ohio Supreme Court
1Per curiam
Due process of law protects an accused against conviction except upon “proof beyond a reasonable doubt of every fact necessary to constitute the crime with which he is charged.” In re Winship (1970), 397 U. S. 358, 364. A penal statute or ordinance, pursuant to which one is charged, must be interpreted and applied strictly against the accuser, and liberally in favor of the accused. Mentor v. Giordano (1967), 9 Ohio St. 2d 140; State v. Conley (1947), 147 Ohio St. 351; State v. Meyers (1897), 56 Ohio St. 340.*
Ordinance No. 45-72 proscribes a person’s being “found in” a “home, place, room or…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- In Re WINSHIPSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- City of Mentor v. GiordanoOhio Supreme Court · 1967
- Greenhills Home Owners Corp. v. Village of GreenhillsOhio Supreme Court · 1966
- Rucker v. StateOhio Supreme Court · 1928
- Village of Strongsville v. McPheeOhio Supreme Court · 1944
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- State v. WilsonOhio Supreme Court · 1979
- State v. HardyOhio Court of Appeals · 1978
- State v. EnglishOhio Court of Appeals · 1991
- State v. WilsonOhio Court of Appeals · 1978
- State v. WeissmanOhio Supreme Court · 1982
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.