State v. Wilson
Ohio Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtLochee, J.
7
Appellant raises two constitutional issues for this court’s consideration. Briefly stated, appellant contends that R. C. 2911.11(A) (3), Ohio’s aggravated burglary statute, violates the Equal Protection and Due Process Clauses of the United States Constitution. The state of Ohio, however, maintains, in effect, that appellant should not be permitted to raise these issues because his guilty plea precludes any constitutional attack on the statute under which he was convicted.
Appellee relies upon a trilogy of United States Supreme Court cases in support of its position, namely, Brady v. United…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- In Re WINSHIPSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Brady v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- McMann v. RichardsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Mullaney v. WilburSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Tollett v. HendersonSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by107 opinions
- State v. Adams (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court · 2015
- State v. KettererOhio Supreme Court · 2006
- State v. FitzpatrickOhio Supreme Court · 2004
- Village of Montpelier v. GreenoOhio Supreme Court · 1986
- State v. GreenOhio Court of Appeals · 1984
102 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.