Legal Opinion

City of Mentor v. Giordano

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided March 15, 1967No. 40038PublishedCited by 101 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtZimmeRman, J.

This case involves the alleged commission of a misdemeanor, a misdemeanor being an offense carrying a penalty less than imprisonment in the penitentiary. Section, 1.06, Revised Code. First, defendant complains of an infringement of his constitutional rights, but we find no substantial basis for such claim. He voluntarily accompanied the patrolman who apprehended him to the Mentor police station, and he voluntarily took the tests to which he was subjected. No coercion, mistreatment or abuse are asserted. Probably defendant’s most insistent complaint is that he was unconstitutionally denied a…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. State v. BakerWashington Supreme Court · 1960
  2. Pruitt v. StateTennessee Supreme Court · 1965
  3. State v. ConleyOhio Supreme Court · 1947
  4. State v. EdwardsOhio Court of Appeals · 1965
  5. Harry Goldberg Co. v. EmermanOhio Supreme Court · 1932

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by101 opinions

  1. City of Defiance v. KretzOhio Supreme Court · 1991
  2. State v. TateOhio Supreme Court · 1979
  3. Cassidy v. GlossipOhio Supreme Court · 1967
  4. City of Oregon v. SzakovitsOhio Supreme Court · 1972
  5. State v. ClearyOhio Supreme Court · 1986

96 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API