Legal Opinion

State v. Weissman

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided March 3, 1982No. 81-49PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Per curiam

After reviewing the record, we conclude that there is insufficient evidence of the intent necessary for the commission of this crime.

R. C. 2909.04, in part, provides:

“(A) No person, purposely by any means, or knowingly by damaging or tampering with any property, shall do any of the following:
“(1) Interrupt or impair television, radio, telephone, telegraph, or other mass communications service, or police, fire, or other public service communications, or radar, loran, radio, or other electronic aids to air or marine navigation or communications, or amateur or citizens band radio communications…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Greenhills Home Owners Corp. v. Village of GreenhillsOhio Supreme Court · 1966
  2. Rucker v. StateOhio Supreme Court · 1928
  3. Village of Strongsville v. McPheeOhio Supreme Court · 1944
  4. City of Bedford Heights v. TallaricoOhio Supreme Court · 1971
  5. City of Washington Court House v. McStoweOhio Supreme Court · 1976

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Kinsey v. Board of TrusteesOhio Supreme Court · 1990
  2. Deskins v. YoungOhio Supreme Court · 1986
  3. Hardy v. VerMeulenOhio Supreme Court · 1987

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API