Rucker v. State
Ohio Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtDay, J.
The errors complained of in this record may be grouped under three heads: (1) Error as to the claimed defense of insanity; (2) error as to the exercise of peremptory challenges by the state; and (3) error as to the failure of the court to charge on self-defense.
As to the defense of insanity, in homicide cases the line of demarcation between such defense and that of drunkenness is clearly defined. In the case of Long v. State, 109 Ohio St., 77, at page 86, 141 N. E., 691, 694, it is said:
“It is well established in American jurisprudence that drunkenness is not a defense to crime. When all the…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Pointer v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1894
- Jones v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1913
- Scott v. StateOhio Supreme Court · 1923
- Cheadle v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1915
- Maulding v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1916
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by35 opinions
- Driscoll v. Austintown AssociatesOhio Supreme Court · 1975
- State Ex Rel. Herbert v. FergusonOhio Supreme Court · 1944
- State v. GordonOhio Supreme Court · 1971
- State, Ex Rel. v. West LakeOhio Supreme Court · 1951
- Parker v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1969
30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.