Legal Opinion
Hoegger v. F. H. Lawson & Co.
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided September 27, 1929PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
CAFFEY, District Judge.
Motion by defendant to set aside service of process.
The suit is for infringement of United States letters, patent. An injunction and accounting are sought. The articles involved are wall cabinets. The bill was filed August 3, 1929. The subpcena was served August 12, 1929.
The bill alleges that the defendant has a regular place of business at 169 Duane street, New York City, which is within this district. Service was made at the Graybar building, 420 Lexington avenue, in the borough of Manhattan, which is also within this district. The return of the marshal recites that…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- W. S. Tyler Co. v. Ludlow-Saylor Wire Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1915
- American Electric Welding Co. v. Lalance & Grosjean Mfg. Co.District Court, D. Massachusetts · 1917
- Winterbottom v. CaseyDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 1922
- L. E. Waterman Co. v. Parker Pen Co.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Eastern Pennsylvania · 1900
3Cited by8 opinions
- Brevel Products Corp. v. H & B AMERICAN CORPORATIONDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1962
- Elevator Supplies Co. v. Wagner Mfg. Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1931
- Patent Tube Corp. v. Bristol-Myers Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1938
- Wilson v. McKinney Mfg. Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1932
- Marlatt v. Mergenthaler Linotype Co.District Court, S.D. California · 1947
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.