Legal Opinion

Marlatt v. Mergenthaler Linotype Co.

District Court, S.D. California

Decided February 27, 1947No. 4482PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WEINBERGER, District Jfidge.

On May 22, 1945, plaintiff filed his complaint herein, alleging that defendant had been and was infringing plaintiff’s letters patent by making, selling and shipping into this District and using, typographical machines and linotype machines embodying the patented invention of plaintiff. By said complaint, plaintiff prayed for injunctive relief and for an accounting for profits and for damages.

On September 12, 1945, defendant filed a motion to dismiss for lack of jurisdiction on the ground that the defendant is not an inhabitant of the Southern District of…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. McLean v. FlemingSupreme Court of the United States · 1878
  2. Menendez v. HoltSupreme Court of the United States · 1888
  3. Galliher v. CadwellSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
  4. Gallup v. CaldwellCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1941
  5. Rossiter v. VogelCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1943

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Knapp-Monarch Co. v. Casco Products Corp. And E.A. Langenfeld Associates, Ltd.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1965
  2. Intermedics, Inc. v. Ventritex, Inc.District Court, N.D. California · 1991
  3. Ferguson v. Ford Motor Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1948
  4. Lindly & Co. v. Karl H. Inderfurth Co.District Court, E.D. North Carolina · 1961

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API