Legal Opinion

W. S. Tyler Co. v. Ludlow-Saylor Wire Co.

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided March 22, 1915No. Nos. 441 and 622PublishedCited by 97 opinions

APPEAL FROM AND PETITION EOK CEKTIORAKI TO THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK. The facts are stated in the opinion. There was an established place of business and an infringement committed in New York. American Stoker Co. v. Underfeed Stoker Co., 182 Fed. Rep. 642; Chadeloid Chemical Co. v. Chicago Finishing Co., 180 Fed. Rep. 770; Chicago Tool Co. v. Phila. Tool Co., 118 Fed. Rep. 852; Wesiinghouse Co. v. Stanley Co., 116 Fed.

Read the full summary

APPEAL FROM AND PETITION EOK CEKTIORAKI TO THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK. The facts are stated in the opinion. There was an established place of business and an infringement committed in New York. American Stoker Co. v. Underfeed Stoker Co., 182 Fed. Rep. 642; Chadeloid Chemical Co. v. Chicago Finishing Co., 180 Fed. Rep. 770; Chicago Tool Co. v. Phila. Tool Co., 118 Fed. Rep. 852; Wesiinghouse Co. v. Stanley Co., 116 Fed. Rep. 641; S. C., 121 Fed. Rep. 101.

1Opinion of the Court

Memorandum opinion by

Mk. Justice McReynolds,

by direction of the court.

Alleging infringement of its patent and asking appropriate relief appellant, an Ohio corporation, instituted this proceeding in equity against the Ludlow-Saylor Wire Company, a corporation organized under the laws of Missouri, in the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York. Objection to the jurisdiction was sustained and a direct appeal to this court allowed.

The cause is properly here upon the appeal and the application for certiorari heretofore presented (No. 622) must be denied.

The act of March…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Green v. Chicago, Burlington & Quincy Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1907

3Cited by97 opinions

  1. Shambe v. Delaware Hudson R. R. Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1926
  2. Gulf Smokeless Coal Co. v. Sutton, Steele & Steele.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1929
  3. Reynolds v. Missouri, Kansas & Texas Railway Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1916
  4. Knapp-Monarch Co. v. Casco Products Corp. And E.A. Langenfeld Associates, Ltd.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1965
  5. Lumiere v. Mae Edna Wilder, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1923

92 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API