Legal Opinion

L. E. Waterman Co. v. Parker Pen Co.

U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Eastern Pennsylvania

Decided February 16, 1900No. Nos. 25, 26PublishedCited by 7 opinions

In Equity.

1Opinion of the Court

DALLAS, Circuit Judge.

Tbe complainant’s claim of jurisdiction in this court rests upon a return of service of process, as follows:

“November 28, 1899, at Philadelphia, in my district, served the within writ on the Parker Pen Company, at the place of business of said company in the National Export Exposition, by giving a true and attested copy thereof to William A. Sehacht, the agent in charge, and making known the contents of same to him.”

This return is not conclusive of the question whether the place to which it refers was or was not a regular and established place of business of the…

2Cited by7 opinions

  1. Earle v. Chesapeake & O. Ry. Co.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Eastern Pennsylvania · 1904
  2. Hoegger v. F. H. Lawson & Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1929
  3. State v. ShirkIndiana Court of Appeals · 1920
  4. L. E. Waterman Co. v. Parker Pen Co.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1901
  5. Columbian Nat. Life Ins. v. RobbinsDistrict Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 1938

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API