Legal Opinion
Wilson v. McKinney Mfg. Co.
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided May 31, 1932No. 6706PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
WILBUR, Circuit Judge.
Appellant brought an action based upon a patent for a form of lock which he claims is being infringed by the appellee. The action was brought in the United States District Court for the Northern District of California, Southern Division. Upon motion to quash and to dismiss for want of jurisdiction, the court quashed the service of subpoena and dismissed the action. The sole question presented by the record is whether or not the ap-pellee has “a- regular and established business” in that district within the meaning of that phrase as used in section 48 of the Judicial Code…
2Cases cited27 opinions
- Green v. Chicago, Burlington & Quincy Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1907
- St. Clair v. CoxSupreme Court of the United States · 1882
- The Lafayette Ins. Co. v. FRENCHSupreme Court of the United States · 1856
- Goldey v. Morning NewsSupreme Court of the United States · 1895
- St. Louis Southwestern Railway Co. of Texas v. AlexanderSupreme Court of the United States · 1913
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Phillips v. BakerCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1941
- Endrezze v. Dorr Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1938
- Haight v. Viking Pump Co. of DelawareDistrict Court, E.D. Wisconsin · 1939
- Shelton v. SchwartzDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 1942
- Lex Tex Ltd. v. Aileen, Inc.District Court, S.D. Florida · 1971