Legal Opinion

Cowardin v. Finnerty

Wyoming Supreme Court

Decided December 28, 1999No. 98-292PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

LEHMAN, Chief Justice.

Appellants Anne L. Cowardin and George Bach (Purchasers) appeal the district court’s order denying their motion for attorney fees and rejecting their claim for breach of the implied covenant of good faith and fair dealing. We find the district court properly denied Purchasers’ motion for attorney fees and affirm that portion of the judgment. We also find the district court properly dismissed the claim for breach of the implied covenant, and we affirm that portion of the judgment, although on different grounds. We find, however, that the district court erred in awarding…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Wilder v. Cody Country Chamber of CommerceWyoming Supreme Court · 1994
  2. McCullough v. Golden Rule Insurance Co.Wyoming Supreme Court · 1990
  3. Springer v. Blue Cross & Blue Shield of WyomingWyoming Supreme Court · 1997
  4. JBC of Wyoming Corp. v. City of CheyenneWyoming Supreme Court · 1992
  5. Darlow v. Farmers Insurance ExchangeWyoming Supreme Court · 1991

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Grynberg v. Questar Pipeline Co.Utah Supreme Court · 2003
  2. Scherer Construction, LLC v. Hedquist Construction, Inc.Wyoming Supreme Court · 2001
  3. Littlejohn v. ParrishOhio Court of Appeals · 2005
  4. Cline v. Rocky Mountain, Inc.Wyoming Supreme Court · 2000
  5. Jensen v. Fremont Motors Cody, Inc.Wyoming Supreme Court · 2002

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API