Legal Opinion

Darlow v. Farmers Insurance Exchange

Wyoming Supreme Court

Decided December 9, 1991No. 91-76PublishedCited by 38 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

URBIGKIT, Chief Justice.

The issue to be decided by this appeal is whether the conduct of an insurer with its insured constituted bad faith under the rule this court announced in McCullough v. Golden Rule Ins. Co., 789 P.2d 855 (Wyo.1990). The policyholders, appellants Candelaria V. Darlow and Daniel L. Dar-low, appeal from a summary judgment entered in favor of appellee, Farmers Insurance Exchange. Appellants claim appellee acted in bad faith by unreasonably delaying or denying auto insurance policy medical payment benefits owed following a two-car collision where both vehicles were insured…

2Cases cited32 opinions

  1. Egan v. Mutual of Omaha InsuranceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1979
  2. Anderson v. Continental InsuranceWisconsin Supreme Court · 1978
  3. Rawlings v. ApodacaArizona Supreme Court · 1986
  4. Neal v. Farmers Insurance ExchangeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1978
  5. Beck v. Farmers Insurance ExchangeUtah Supreme Court · 1985

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by38 opinions

  1. Wilder v. Cody Country Chamber of CommerceWyoming Supreme Court · 1994
  2. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co. v. ShraderWyoming Supreme Court · 1994
  3. Doctors' Co. v. Insurance Corp. of AmericaWyoming Supreme Court · 1993
  4. Herrig v. HerrigWyoming Supreme Court · 1992
  5. Cathcart v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance CompanyWyoming Supreme Court · 2005

33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API