Legal Opinion

Littlejohn v. Parrish

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided September 16, 2005No. C-040720PublishedCited by 58 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Mark P. Painter, Judge.

{¶ 1} May a mortgagor prepay a note secured by real estate when the note states that prepayment is subject to the mortgagee’s approval, but does not contain language that consent shall not be unreasonably withheld? And is the contract subject to an implied term of good faith and fair dealing? We find very little Ohio law on the subject, and what there is we believe to be mistaken. We answer yes to both questions.

{¶ 2} Plaintiffs-appellants Roger and Joan Littlejohn appeal the trial court’s summary judgment in favor of defendants-appellees Donald and Elaine Parrish.…

2Cases cited28 opinions

  1. Village of Grafton v. Ohio Edison Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1996
  2. Comunale v. Traders & General InsuranceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1958
  3. Fortune v. National Cash Register Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1977
  4. Doe v. ShafferOhio Supreme Court · 2000
  5. Mers v. Dispatch Printing Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1985

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by58 opinions

  1. Dick Broadcasting Company, Inc. of Tennessee v. Oak Ridge FM, Inc.Tennessee Supreme Court · 2013
  2. Blair v. McDonaghOhio Court of Appeals · 2008
  3. Randleman v. Fidelity National Title InsuranceDistrict Court, N.D. Ohio · 2006
  4. Doe v. College of WoosterDistrict Court, N.D. Ohio · 2017
  5. Cunningham Prop. Mgmt. Trust v. Ascent Res. - Utica, LLCDistrict Court, S.D. Ohio · 2018

53 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API