Legal Opinion

Chinn v. KMR Property Management

California Court of Appeal

Decided August 22, 2008No. B196321PublishedCited by 33 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

KRIEGLER, J.

Plaintiff accepted an offer to compromise pursuant to Code of Civil Procedure section 998, 1 agreeing to dismiss her tort action in exchange for a monetary payment. After entry of the order of dismissal, the trial court awarded costs to plaintiff, but denied recovery of attorney fees. Plaintiff appeals the award of costs, contending that she is entitled to additional costs and an award of attorney fees based on a broadly worded attorney fee provision in her lease agreement and as the prevailing party with a net monetary recovery under the cost provisions of section 1032. We…

2Cases cited33 opinions

  1. Parsons v. Bristol Development Co.California Supreme Court · 1965
  2. Santisas v. GoodinCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1998
  3. Chia-Lee Hsu v. AbbaraCalifornia Supreme Court · 1995
  4. T. M. Cobb Co. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1984
  5. International Industries, Inc. v. OlenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1978

28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by33 opinions

  1. In re Tobacco Cases IICalifornia Court of Appeal · 2015
  2. Wohlgemuth v. Caterpillar Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2012
  3. deSaulles v. Community Hospital of the Monterey PeninsulaCalifornia Supreme Court · 2016
  4. Silverado Modjeska Recreation & Park District v. County of OrangeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2011
  5. In re Tobacco Cases ICalifornia Court of Appeal · 2011

28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API