Legal Opinion
Silverado Modjeska Recreation & Park District v. County of Orange
California Court of Appeal
Decided July 8, 2011No. D055150PublishedCited by 34 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
BENKE, Acting P. J.
In this case we consider an environmental review process which commenced in 2002. During the course of that process the developers of a residential real estate project prepared an environmental impact report (EIR) which was certified by a county board of supervisors in 2003. The EIR was challenged in a prior writ proceeding and as a result of the challenge a writ was issued compelling the county and the developers to prepare a supplemental EIR (SEIR) which more thoroughly considered the impact of the project on water quality. The SEIR was circulated and certified in…
2Cases cited34 opinions
- Laurel Heights Improvement Ass'n of San Francisco, Inc. v. Regents of University of CaliforniaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1988
- Santisas v. GoodinCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1998
- Topanga Assn. for a Scenic Comm. v. CTY OF LOS ANGELESCalifornia Supreme Court · 1974
- Chia-Lee Hsu v. AbbaraCalifornia Supreme Court · 1995
- Bily v. Arthur Young & Co.California Supreme Court · 1992
29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by34 opinions
- Douglas E. Barnhart, Inc. v. CMC Fabricators, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2012
- Ballona Wetlands Land Trust v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2011
- Eden Township Healthcare District v. Eden Medical CenterCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2013
- Williams v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2013
- Key v. Tyler, California Court of Appeal, 5th District2019
29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.