Legal Opinion
Wohlgemuth v. Caterpillar Inc.
California Court of Appeal
Decided July 23, 2012No. F061981PublishedCited by 45 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
*1256Opinion
KANE, J.
Plaintiffs Richard L. Wohlgemuth and Gloria M. Wohlgemuth purchased a new motor home that had an engine manufactured and warranted by defendant Caterpillar Inc. Plaintiffs subsequently claimed the engine was defective and sued defendant under the Song-Beverly Consumer Warranty Act (Civ. Code,1 § 1790 et seq.; Song-Beverly Act), alleging that defendant failed to repair the defects after a reasonable number of attempts. Shortly before trial, defendant made a Code of Civil Procedure section 998 offer to compromise. The offer provided that plaintiffs would be paid $50,000, in…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Santisas v. GoodinCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1998
- Coalition of Concerned Communities, Inc. v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 2004
- Murillo v. Fleetwood Enterprises, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1998
- Folsom v. Butte County Assn. of GovernmentsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1982
- Graciano v. Robinson Ford Sales, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2006
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by45 opinions
- deSaulles v. Community Hospital of the Monterey PeninsulaCalifornia Supreme Court · 2016
- Hanna v. Mercedes-Benz USA, LLC, California Court of Appeal, 5th District2019
- Calvo Fisher & Jacob LLP v. LujanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2015
- Friends of Spring St. v. Nev. City, California Court of Appeal, 5th District2019
- Roe v. Halbig, California Court of Appeal, 5th District2018
40 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.