Legal Opinion
T. M. Cobb Co. v. Superior Court
California Supreme Court
Decided July 2, 1984No. S.F. 24572PublishedCited by 107 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
BIRD, C. J.
The sole issue presented by this case is whether an offer of compromise made pursuant to section 998 of the Code of Civil Procedure is revocable.
I
The relevant facts are not in dispute. Real parties in interest, Sherre Sturm and William Conrow (hereafter, real parties), sued petitioner, T. M. Cobb Company, Inc., and others for the negligent design and construction of real parties’ residence. Cobb was the manufacturer and supplier of approximately 60 units of sash and glass for the windows used in the construction of the residence. Extensive leaks developed in and around the…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Moyer v. Workmen's Compensation Appeals BoardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1973
- Select Base Materials, Inc. v. Board of EqualizationCalifornia Supreme Court · 1959
- Meyer v. BenkoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1976
- Palo Alto Town & Country Village, Inc. v. Bbtc CompanyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1974
- Distefano v. HallCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1968
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by107 opinions
- Iverson v. Muroc Unified School DistrictCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1995
- Monster Energy Company v. SchechterCalifornia Supreme Court · 2019
- Fassberg Construction Co. v. Housing AuthorityCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2007
- Martinez v. Brownco Construction Co.California Supreme Court · 2013
- Poster v. Southern California Rapid Transit DistrictCalifornia Supreme Court · 1990
102 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.