Cleveland, Cincinnati, Chicago & St. Louis Railway Co. v. Rumsey
Indiana Court of Appeals
From Boone Circuit Court; Willett H. Parr, Judge. Action by George Z. Rumsey against The Cleveland, Cincinnati, Chicago and St. Louis Railway Company. Prom a judgment for plaintiff, the defendant appeals.
1Opinion of the CourtIbach, C. J.
Appellee brought action against appellant for damages for personal injuries, and recovered judgment Appellant assigns as error that the complaint does not state facts sufficient to constitute a cause of action, and that the court erred in overruling appellant’s motion for judgment on answers to interrogatories.
1. A complaint, attacked for the first time on appeal. is held good if sufficient to bar another action on 1he same state of facts. Cleveland, etc., R. Co. v. Beard (1913), ante, 105, 100 N. E. 392, and cases cited.
*3732. The present complaint, in substance, alleges that appellant was on…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Cleveland, Cincinnati, Columbus & Indianapolis Railway Co. v. HarringtonIndiana Supreme Court · 1892
- McCoy v. Kokomo Railway & Light Co.Indiana Supreme Court · 1902
- Greenawaldt v. Lake Shore & Michigan Southern Railway Co.Indiana Supreme Court · 1905
- Cleveland, Cincinnati, Chicago & St. Louis Railway Co. v. LynnIndiana Supreme Court · 1908
- City of Franklin v. HarterIndiana Supreme Court · 1891
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Chicago, Indianapolis & Louisville Railway Co. v. GormanIndiana Court of Appeals · 1914
- Cleveland, Cincinnati, Chicago & St. Louis Railway Co. v. MarkleIndiana Supreme Court · 1918
- Union Traction Co. v. ElmoreIndiana Court of Appeals · 1917
- Baker v. Baltimore & Ohio Southwestern RailroadIndiana Court of Appeals · 1916
- Payne, Agent v. ViseIndiana Court of Appeals · 1922