Cleveland, Cincinnati, Chicago & St. Louis Railway Co. v. Markle
Indiana Supreme Court
From Randolph Circuit Court; James S. Engle, Judge. Action by Grant C. Markle against the Cleveland, Cincinnati, Chicago and St. Louis Railway Company. u From a judgment for the plaintiff, the defendant appeals.
1Opinion of the CourtMyers, J.
— -On January 29, 1913, at Union street crossing of appellant’s railroad tracks in the city of Winchester, Indiana, one of appellant’s locomotives pulling a fast freight train collided with a buggy drawn by two horses, in which appellee was riding, injuring him, and for such injuries this action was brought to recover damages. On the issue formed by the complaint and general denial a jury returned a verdict in favor of appellee. Appellant’s motion for a new trial was overruled, and from a judgment against it this appeal was prosecuted. The errors assigned and relied on, six in number, will be…
2Cases cited30 opinions
- Grand Trunk Railway Co. v. IvesSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
- Consolidated Stone Co. v. SummitIndiana Supreme Court · 1899
- Oleson v. Lake Shore & Michigan Southern Railway Co.Indiana Supreme Court · 1896
- Inland Steel Co. v. SmithIndiana Supreme Court · 1907
- Robinson v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1912
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Citizens Telephone Co. v. PrickettIndiana Supreme Court · 1919
- Indiana Pipe Line Co. v. ChristensenIndiana Supreme Court · 1924
- Budkiewicz v. Elgin, Joliet & Eastern Railway Co.Indiana Supreme Court · 1958
- Cleveland, Cincinnati, Chicago & St. Louis Railway Co. v. WolfIndiana Supreme Court · 1920
- New York Central Railroad v. De LeuryIndiana Court of Appeals · 1934
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.