Legal Opinion

City of Franklin v. Harter

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided March 14, 1891No. 14,900PublishedCited by 23 opinions

From the Johnson Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the CourtElliott, J.

The appellee recovered judgment against the appellant for injuries resulting from a fall into a cellar-way in one of the sidewalks of the appellant, which it is alleged was negligently suffered to remain without guards or warnings.

The objection urged against the complaint is that it does not show that the plaintiff was not guilty of contributory negligence. It does contain the usual general averment that the plaintiff was free from fault, and the specific allegations do not overcome the general averment. The fact that the plaintiff was blind does not, in itself, authorize the con*447elusion, as…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. City of Warsaw v. DunlapIndiana Supreme Court · 1887

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. Taylor v. City of CincinnatiOhio Supreme Court · 1944
  2. Conner v. Citizens' Street RailroadIndiana Supreme Court · 1896
  3. City of Indianapolis v. KeeleyIndiana Supreme Court · 1906
  4. New York Central R.R. Co. v. CaseyIndiana Supreme Court · 1938
  5. Stoy v. Louisville, Evansville & St. Louis Consolidated RailroadIndiana Supreme Court · 1903

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API