Legal Opinion

Cleveland, Cincinnati, Columbus & Indianapolis Railway Co. v. Harrington

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided February 16, 1892No. 14,484PublishedCited by 64 opinions

From the Marion Superior Court.

1Opinion of the CourtCoffey, J.

This was an action by the appellee, in the Marion Superior Court, against the appellant, to recover damages occasioned by a personal injury.

The injury on account of which damages are claimed occurred in the city of Indianapolis at a point where the appellant’s railroad tracks cross Ohio street. The complaint alleges substantially, among other things, that the train *428which inflicted the injury for which suit was brought was negligently run at a high and dangerous rate of speed in violation of a city ordinance, ánd without ringing the bell. It also contains the usual allegation that the appellee…

2Cases cited27 opinions

  1. Detroit & Milwaukee Railroad v. Van SteinburgMichigan Supreme Court · 1868
  2. Thorpe v. Rutland & Burlington RailroadSupreme Court of Vermont · 1854
  3. Ohio & Mississippi R. W. Co. v. CollarnIndiana Supreme Court · 1881
  4. Greany v. . Long Island Railroad Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1886
  5. Chicago & Eastern Illinois Railroad v. O'ConnorIllinois Supreme Court · 1886

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by64 opinions

  1. Malott v. HawkinsIndiana Supreme Court · 1902
  2. State v. BarrettIndiana Supreme Court · 1909
  3. Shea v. City of MuncieIndiana Supreme Court · 1897
  4. State Ex Rel. Mavity v. TyndallIndiana Supreme Court · 1947
  5. Lake Shore & Michigan Southern Railway Co. v. McIntoshIndiana Supreme Court · 1894

59 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API