Legal Opinion

Greenawaldt v. Lake Shore & Michigan Southern Railway Co.

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided April 7, 1905No. 20,542PublishedCited by 34 opinions

Erom Lagrange Circuit Court; J. D. F err all, Judge. Action by Mary E. Greenawaldt against tbe Lake Shore & Michigan Southern Railway Company. Erom a judgment for defendant, plaintiff appeals. Transferred from Appellate Court under §1337u Burns 1901, Acts 1901, p. 590.

1Opinion of the CourtHadley, C. J.

Appellant sues to recover damages for personal injuries alleged to have been received through the negligence of appellee., The court sustained a demurrer, for insufficiency of facts, to what is called in the record the third amended complaint. The plaintiff refused to amend, and judgment for cost was rendered against her, from which judgment she appeals.

It is alleged in the complaint that the defendant owns and operates a double-tracked railroad running generally east and west through Dekalb county, which, as it approaches the town of Butler, runs in a slightly northeast and southwest…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Stoy v. Louisville, Evansville & St. Louis Consolidated RailroadIndiana Supreme Court · 1903

3Cited by34 opinions

  1. Lindley v. SinkIndiana Supreme Court · 1940
  2. McIntyre v. OrnerIndiana Supreme Court · 1906
  3. Tippecanoe Loan & Trust Co. v. JesterIndiana Supreme Court · 1913
  4. Indiana Union Traction Co. v. LoveIndiana Supreme Court · 1912
  5. Citizens Telephone Co. v. PrickettIndiana Supreme Court · 1919

29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API