William R. Thropp & Sons Co. v. De Laski & Thropp Circular Woven Tire Co.
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
Appeal from the District Court of the United States for the District oE New Jersey; Thos. G. Haight, Judge. * Suit in equity by the De Raski & Thropp Circular Woven Tire Coni' pany against the William R. Thropp & Sons Company. Decree for complainant, and defendant appeals.
1Opinion of the Court
WOOEEEY, Circuit Judge.
This is an appeal from the decree of the District Court of the United States for.the District of New Jersey, holding valid "and infringed letters patent No. 1,011,450, issued on December 12, 1911, to the De Lasld & Thropp Circular Woven Tire Company, the complainant, upon the assignment of Albert De Easki and;Ppter;D. Thropp, the applicants De Laski & Thropp C. W. T. Co. v. Wm. R. Thropp & Sons Co. (D. C.) 218 Fed. 458. Infringement is denied, and the validity of the patent is attacked, first, for want of invention, and' second, upon the claim that invention, if found…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Potts v. CreagerSupreme Court of the United States · 1895
- Smith v. Goodyear Dental Vulcanite Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1877
- Magowan v. New York Belting & Packing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1891
- De Laski & Thropp Circular Woven Tire Co. v. William R. Thropp & Sons Co.District Court, D. New Jersey · 1914
- United Shirt & Collar Co. v. BeattieCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1906
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by34 opinions
- Mueller Brass Co. v. Reading Industries, Inc.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1972
- Monsanto Company v. KampDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1967
- Jamesbury Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1975
- Larson v. CrowtherCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1928
- Allen v. WingerterCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1927
29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.