United Shirt & Collar Co. v. Beattie
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
Appeal from the Circuit Court of the United States for the Northern District of New York. On appeal from a decree of tho Oircnit Court for the Northern District of New Zork holding valid and infringed the first four claims of letters patent No. 645,871, granted March 20, 1900, to tho complainant, United Shirt & Collar Company, as assignee of James K. P. Pine, the inventor,' for an improvement in machines for intuming the edges of collars, cuffs and like articles.
Read the full summary
Appeal from the Circuit Court of the United States for the Northern District of New York. On appeal from a decree of tho Oircnit Court for the Northern District of New Zork holding valid and infringed the first four claims of letters patent No. 645,871, granted March 20, 1900, to tho complainant, United Shirt & Collar Company, as assignee of James K. P. Pine, the inventor,' for an improvement in machines for intuming the edges of collars, cuffs and like articles. The application was filed October 3, 3894. The other complainant, Reece Folding Machine Company, is the sole licensee and is…
1Opinion of the Court
COXE, Circuit Judge.
The Pine patent relates to improvements in machines for infolding the edges of cuff blanks by which the infolds are formed in the blanks and are pressed with the fabric folded back on itself by the combined action of -the support on which the blanks are placed, a templet defining the form of the blanks, and infolders actuated to carry the subtending edges of the blanks inwardly or over the defining edges of the templet. The infold thus formed is fixed in the blanks by pressure between the support and the infolders before the templet has been removed and the infolders…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Topliff v. TopliffSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
- Potts v. CreagerSupreme Court of the United States · 1895
- Agawam Co. v. JordanSupreme Court of the United States · 1869
- Clough v. BarkerSupreme Court of the United States · 1882
- Hutter v. De Q. Bottle Stopper Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1904
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- James C. Hobbs v. Wisconsin Power & Light Company and William Powell CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1957
- Ottumwa Box Car Loader Co. v. Christy Box Car Loader Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1914
- William R. Thropp & Sons Co. v. De Laski & Thropp Circular Woven Tire Co.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1915
- Block v. Nathan Anklet Support Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1925
- Claude Neon Lights, Inc. v. E. MacHlett & SonCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1928
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.