De Laski & Thropp Circular Woven Tire Co. v. William R. Thropp & Sons Co.
District Court, D. New Jersey
In Equity. Suit by tbe De Laski & Thropp Circular Woven Tire Company against the William R. Thropp & Sons Company. On final hearing.
1Opinion of the Court
HAIGHT, District Judge.
This suit is for an alleged infringement of letters patent No. 1,011,450, issued to the plaintiff, as assignee of Albert De Laski and Peter D. Thropp, December 12, 1911. The answer denies infringement, and alleges that the patent is invalid.
[1] In support of the latter defense, it is contended that, in view of the prior state of the art, the patent involved no invention, and that, if it did, it was not the joint invention of De Laski and Thropp, but the sole invention of Thropp. The subject-matter of the patent is a machine for wrapping fabric around automobile tires…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Potts v. CreagerSupreme Court of the United States · 1895
- National Cash Register Co. v. American Cash Register Co.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1892
- Vrooman v. PenhollowCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1910
- Worden v. FisherDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 1882
- Barrett v. HallU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Massachusetts · 1818
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by22 opinions
- Monsanto Company v. KampDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1967
- Jamesbury Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1975
- William R. Thropp & Sons Co. v. De Laski & Thropp Circular Woven Tire Co.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1915
- Johns-Manville Corporation v. National Tank Seal Co.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1931
- Rival Manufacturing Company v. Dazey Products CompanyDistrict Court, W.D. Missouri · 1973
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.