Legal Opinion
Monsanto Company v. Kamp
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided June 15, 1967No. Civ. A. 2372-64PublishedCited by 45 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
HOLTZOFF, District Judge.
This is an action under 35 U.S.C. § 146, to set aside a determination by the Patent Office, in an interference proceeding, awarding to the defendants Kamp and Jahn, rights of priority to a patent. At this time the case was before this Court on a separate trial as to one of the issues.
The invention involved in this controversy relates to plastic bottles, such as are used for pharmaceutical products. Specifically it consists of coating or lining bottles of this type with a resin compound to prevent the loss of liquid contents by permeation or evaporation. The…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Morgan v. DanielsSupreme Court of the United States · 1894
- S. H. Kress & Company v. Elie P. Aghnides and Chase Brass & Copper Company, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1957
- William R. Thropp & Sons Co. v. De Laski & Thropp Circular Woven Tire Co.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1915
- Vrooman v. PenhollowCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1910
- De Laski & Thropp Circular Woven Tire Co. v. William R. Thropp & Sons Co.District Court, D. New Jersey · 1914
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by45 opinions
- Kimberly-Clark Corporation v. The Procter & Gamble Distributing Co., Inc. And the Procter & Gamble Company, Defendants/cross-AppellantsCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1992
- Amax Fly Ash Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1975
- Jamesbury Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1975
- Vanderbilt University v. ICOS CORP.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2010
- Standard Oil Company v. MontedisonCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1976
40 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.