Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

Allen v. Wingerter

Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit

Decided February 25, 1927No. 3562PublishedCited by 23 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WOOLLET, Circuit Judge.

This appeal is from a decree of the District Court dismissing the plaintiff’s bill on finding the patent valid but not infringed. The patent is No. 1,549,177, issued August 11, 1925, to J. P. Allen; the claims in suit are 2-5, 7-9,12-16. The invention of the patent is an apparatus for molding rubber articles and particularly for making rubber receptacles for storage batteries arranged for conveniently loading the mold and conveniently discharging the article without distorting it.

Addressing our discussion to the making of rubber battery boxes, it should be observed that…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Eibel Process Co. v. Minnesota & Ontario Paper Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1923
  2. William R. Thropp & Sons Co. v. De Laski & Thropp Circular Woven Tire Co.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1915
  3. Penfield v. Chambers Bros. Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1899
  4. Murray v. Detroit Wire Spring Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1913
  5. International Banding MacH. Co. v. American Bander Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1925

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. Montgomery Ward & Co. v. ClairCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1941
  2. Gordon Form Lathe Co. v. Walcott MacH. Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1929
  3. Freeman v. AltvaterCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1933
  4. Johns-Manville Corporation v. National Tank Seal Co.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1931
  5. Hartford-Empire Co. v. Swindell Bros.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1938

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API