Legal Opinion

Larson v. Crowther

Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit

Decided May 14, 1928No. 7989PublishedCited by 25 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

KENYON, Circuit Judge.

Early in 1918 appellant, Larson, and appellee, Crowther, filed applications in the Patent Office for patents upon process and apparatus hereinafter described. The Crowther applications were first filed, closely followed by those of Larson. In a general way it may be said that the process of which each claimed to be the original inventor was based on the idea of the disrupting or destroying of bacteria by subjecting the same to a gas, such as carbon dioxide, which would go into solution readily at 'high pressure, and when the organisms were impregnated therewith to…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Diamond Rubber Co. of New York v. Consolidated Rubber Tire Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1911
  2. Miller v. Eagle Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1894
  3. Morgan v. DanielsSupreme Court of the United States · 1894
  4. Minerals Separation, Ltd. v. HydeSupreme Court of the United States · 1916
  5. Butterworth v. United States Ex Rel. HoeSupreme Court of the United States · 1884

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by25 opinions

  1. BG Corporation v. Walter Kidde & Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1935
  2. City of Milwaukee v. Activated Sludge, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1934
  3. Hemphill Co. v. CoeCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1941
  4. New York Life Ins. Co. v. GriffithCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1929
  5. Liquid Carbonic Corp. v. Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co.District Court, N.D. Ohio · 1941

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API