Legal Opinion

La Cava v. Breedlove

California Court of Appeal

Decided December 3, 1946No. Civ. 15150PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDesmond, P. J.

Defendants appeal from a judgment rendered in an unlawful detainer action in favor of plaintiff by a court sitting without a jury. The judgment decreed that “defendants, Phil Breedlove and Mrs. Phil Breedlove, are guilty of unlawful detainer of the premises .described in the Complaint and that plaintiff Gregory La Cava be restored to possession of said premises; that the agreement under which said property is held was by its terms expired and the same is hereby forfeited; that plaintiff have and recover from the said defendants the sum of $1,633.28, being the rent to May 11, 1945, and the…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Gray v. CottonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1917
  2. Palmer v. ZeisCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1944

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Losornio v. MottaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1998
  2. Fontana v. UppCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1954
  3. Saberi v. BakhtiariCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1985
  4. Pet Milk Co. v. BolandCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1949
  5. College of the Virgin Islands v. Vitex Manufacturing Co.Municipal Court of The Virgin Islands · 1965

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API