Legal Opinion

Palmer v. Zeis

California Court of Appeal

Decided September 6, 1944No. Civ. A. 5852PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtShaw, P. J.

The sole question presented pn this appeal is whether the landlord of a dwelling house who has given a month’s notice under section 1946, of the Civil Code, to terminate a moath to month tenancy, must also, after this month has expired, give a further notice of three days, before he can maintain an unlawful detainer proceeding to oust the tenant. This question arises upon the defendants’ objection to the introduction of evidence on the ground that the complaint alleged no three-day notice and so stated no cause of action. The complaint alleged and the evidence showed that the defendants were…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Samuels v. SingerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1934
  2. Pringle v. WilsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1909
  3. Silva v. CampbellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1890
  4. Owen v. HerzihoffCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1906
  5. Stoppelkamp v. MangeotCalifornia Supreme Court · 1871

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Wallace v. DaleyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1990
  2. La Cava v. BreedloveCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1946
  3. Psihozios v. HumbergCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1947
  4. Lane v. HognasonCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1970
  5. Miller & Desatnik Management Co. v. BullockAppellate Division of the Superior Court of California · 1990

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API