Legal Opinion

Delannoy v. Quetu

California Court of Appeal

Decided July 16, 1925No. Docket No. 4468PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

[EDITORS' NOTE: THIS PAGE CONTAINS HEADNOTES. HEADNOTES ARE NOT AN OFFICIAL PRODUCT OF THE COURT, THEREFORE THEY ARE NOT DISPLAYED.] Early in the year 1909 the respondent Alfred Quetu, a native of France, who had for many years resided in California, owned an option to purchase a ranch consisting of about 400 acres, in Orange County. In the month of May of said year he visited his mother, Hermance Quetu, and his brothers and sisters, all of whom were then residing in France. During his stay abroad his mother delivered to him 60,000 francs for investment in this country, and which he testified…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Bancroft-Whitney Co. v. McHughCalifornia Supreme Court · 1913
  2. Eastman v. PiperCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1924
  3. Woodard v. Glenwood Lumber Co.California Supreme Court · 1915
  4. Forestier v. JohnsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1912
  5. Cunliffe v. Consumers Ass'n of AmericaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1924

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Reynolds v. HookCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1930
  2. Field v. MollisonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1942
  3. Williams v. MyersCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1930
  4. Cappuccio v. TuftsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1930
  5. Bainbridge v. LachenmaierCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1932

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API