Legal Opinion
Arbit Chiropractic v. Commerce Insurance
Massachusetts District Court, Appellate Division
Decided October 10, 2001PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Merrick, PJ.
This is a Dist/Mun. Cts. R. A. D. A., Rule 8A expedited appeal of the allowance of summary judgment in favor of the defendant-insurer on the plaintiff-medical provider’s G.L.c. 90, §34M claim for Personal Injury Protection (“PIP”) payments for treatment provided to the defendants insured.
The Rule 8A(a) (4) summary of undisputed facts indicates that plaintiff Arbit Chiropractic (“Arbit”) supplied chiropractic services to one Idly Galette (“the Insured”) who was insured under a Massachusetts Motor Vehicle policy (“the Policy”) issued by defendant Commerce Insurance Company…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Miles v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1992
- Fascione v. CNA Insurance CompaniesMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2001
- Bailey v. Metropolitan Property & Liability InsuranceMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1987
- Aetna Casualty & Surety Co. v. PoirierMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1976
- Amiga Mutual Insurance v. BagleyMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1989
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Provenzano v. Arbella Mutual InsuranceMassachusetts District Court, Appellate Division · 2007
- Knight v. Middlesex InsuranceMassachusetts District Court, Appellate Division · 2002
- Kratzer v. Liberty Mutual InsuranceMassachusetts District Court, Appellate Division · 2003
- Sonogram of New England, Inc. v. Plymouth Rock Assurance Corp.Massachusetts District Court, Appellate Division · 2003
- Johnson v. LapanMassachusetts District Court, Appellate Division · 2010