Legal Opinion

Knight v. Middlesex Insurance

Massachusetts District Court, Appellate Division

Decided November 13, 2002PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMerrick, P. J.

This is a G.L.c. 90, §34M action by the plaintiff-medical provider to recover Personal Injury Protection (“PIP”) benefits for treatment provided to the defendant’s insured. Summary judgment was entered for the defendant-insurer, and the plaintiff filed this Dist./Mun. Cts. RAD.A, Rule 8C, appeal.

From January through May of 1995, plaintiff Lee S. Knight D.C. (“Knight”) provided chiropractic services to Sokhoeum Sim (“Sim”), who was injured in an automobile accident while a passenger in a vehicle insured by defendant Middlesex Insurance Company (“Middlesex”). Sim was thus an insured under the…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. City of Boston v. Aetna Life InsuranceMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1987
  2. Cosmopolitan Trust Co. v. Leonard Watch Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1924
  3. Chhoeun Ny v. Metropolitan Property & Casualty InsuranceMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2001
  4. Galena v. Commerce InsuranceMassachusetts District Court, Appellate Division · 2001
  5. Arbit Chiropractic v. Commerce InsuranceMassachusetts District Court, Appellate Division · 2001

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Brown v. Norfolk & Dedham Mutual Fire InsuranceMassachusetts District Court, Appellate Division · 2011
  2. Anzalone v. Premier Insurance Co. of MassachusettsMassachusetts District Court, Appellate Division · 2012
  3. Chiropractic Care Centers, Inc. v. Allstate InsuranceMassachusetts District Court, Appellate Division · 2015
  4. Marks v. Commerce InsuranceMassachusetts District Court, Appellate Division · 2006

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API